Edward Snowden, good/bad? Edward Snowden, good/bad?
December 09, 2014, 05:43:37 AM by Kerry
Edward Snowden—Good/Bad?
Withholders always attract withholders. If you are withholding a thought from a loved one it means that they are withholding an equally upsetting thought from you. And, that you began the deceit at the very beginning of the relationship which automatically, non-verbally, granted them permission to withhold their thoughts of choice from you. There are no exceptions to this phenomenon. I'm unaware of any protocol for communicating/reporting perpetrations against a government agency except that I must be willing to experience invalidation and disastrous repercussions. All whistleblowers imagine that a problem not only exists, but persists, because most everyone is complicit, that no one can be trusted to act effectively on the problem. I.E. Everyone knows that police conduct stings to cause a perpetration that would not have taken place except for the combined intentions of the officer and the perpetrator–yet no Police Commissioners have hired a police chief who announces that they would eliminate stings in their department. In other words, an officer who refuses to practice deceit must compromise his/her integrity thereby reducing their communication effectiveness with everyone.* We all non-verbally support our police in being deceptive, as though law and order is dependent upon deceit. More to come * Premise: A person who rationalizes deceit causes all who relate with him/her to mirror their integrity. When a citizen is in communication with a police officer they have no choice whatsoever but to mirrror the integrity of the leader, the officer; ergo many being questioned by an officer find themselves trying to deceive and lie to the officer (a person who is in-integrity inspires integrity). Read Military Scandals Write a Comment:Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment! |
|